Intervention by the RSU in Bologna yesterday 27/11.
addition to criticism that the document setting up a regional secretariat to SLC CGIL has sent workers to Bologna on Monday, the statement opposing the "proposed a manifestation of territorial area and contains a first report of the meeting of 24 November last in Rome.
Ciao a tutti,
il caso Vodafone, che ha visto l'impegno di lavoratrici e lavoratori della nostra azienda (che segue quelli di altre aziende del settore), impone ormai come non più rinviabile la discussione per modificare il quadro normativo che regola la cessione di ramo d’azienda.
Quanto è stato sostenuto e prodotto in questi faticosi e partecipati mesi porta di fatto ad una accelerazione in questo senso.
Come da comunicato di ieri 26 novembre della Slc Emilia Romagna il 21 novembre scorso nel corso dell'attivo regionale dei delegati è stato prodotto l'ordine del giorno che avete tutti letto.
Dal documento emergono due aspetti importanti.
La costruzione di una mobilitazione the domestic sector is the natural outcome of this dispute, though not exhaustive. The proposal for a demonstration of territorial sector is likely to have arrived only recently in stemming some limits and produce a discussion on this important issue.
The most important aspect instead of the 4 delegates on which the CGIL Bologna ask Vodafone to launch a thorough discussion and 'respect to the items proposed to amend the existing rules on sale of branch.
Let us note first the absence of a thorough discussion of such issues prior than 'technical and complex, starting from their own experiences. In
quell'odg will return the following proposed changes:
at one point: "Repeal Article .32 of the legislative decree 276/03 and restore the existing concept of functional autonomy"
to step two: "Recognition by law of the principle of responsibility 'for joint stability' for the duration of employment committed "
At one point the proposed repeal of Article .32 of Legislative Decree 276/03, which deregulated the sale of a business, is fully shared.
Point two, what is perplexing us CGIL delegates Vodafone Bologna is the proposal to recognize by law the principle of joint responsibility for the stability of employment for the duration of the job (which is a fixed term contract): the true guarantee is to preserve the rights for an indefinite period and therefore do not expire as indicated by the proposal of `odg. What we must prevent the passage is in fact a permanent contract term (fixing it at a period equal to the duration of the contract). The mobilization of this sector can only be understood as the central point of the claims.
The serious thing, but that does not prevent us from trying to develop a complete and detailed discussion and awareness of everyone on this central aspect is that no account is taken of what the workers have revealed their latest dispute in Emilia Romagna about the case: almost unanimously workers Vodafone Bologna, along with thousands more on the national territory, they said NO to a mandate to deal with the holding that had this as a feature: the rights that follow the order, even if for 7 years, are not sufficient guarantee to ensure prospects stability and security. You go from a contract of indefinite duration to a fixed-term contracts tied to a contract to maturity and then at the end of the contract, workers who had become too expensive (because it sold to a company with rights and lower wages) will lose their jobs or see the very low wages and rights.
also learn from the newspapers as Alessandro Genovesi, National Secretary Slc, publicize and promote this type of proposal after it 'was presented to the National Assembly of Telecom outsourced to Rome from SLC, and Fistel UILCOM yesterday.
In the document submitted by the trade unions argues that "in case of branch transfer of the holding should be enshrined protections for which there are no reductions in the cost of labor and human rights in the medium term", this is' quite simply unacceptable. You can not 'from a permanent contract and move think protections in the medium term (quantifiable even in a period of 48-72 months) which in fact bring into question the very stability' employment. The rights are guaranteed in the medium but also in the long run.
Safeguards determine if these are not back from the starting conditions. 'Cause rather not take its cue from the pronouncement of the European Court of Justice has ruled that the legitimacy' of legislating the right of the worker to "prevent the transfer of his employment? We believe that the proposed union should start taking into account this aspect.
Also, Saturday, Nov. 24, just a view of widening the debate delegates and workers attended the meeting in Bologna Autoconvocate workers and industry delegates from different unions. And is 'discussed union democracy, opposition to all forms of insecurity' and the subsequent construction of the strike in the sector with the objective of amending the regulatory framework for the work on the issues of working from outsourcing. There will be 'a new appointment in January and will work to build the' broadest possible participation.
MSW Bologna
0 comments:
Post a Comment