Wednesday, October 31, 2007

Diffusion Osmosis Lab Report

The assembly of Ivrea

During the day today, following the first meeting, Ivrea has experienced a new position of the RSU's Office and local trade union in terms of democracy.
The first part of the Assembly has long been guided by considerations very appropriate National Representative of the ICFTU-Fistel on Vodafone's business strategies and Comdata ...
after you have been warned that the time available to us would be better spent in a discussion focused on the terms of the agreement has been reached on the reasons of the SI and NO.
The reasons to vote NO on this draft agreement was expressed by several workers is the method of union practices so far adopted at local, national as well on the content of the hypothesis, after consulting with several lawyers course of employment law.
The reasons for the SI have been expressed by a representative of the solid and Ivrea, which has preferred to read the press union, with all the omissions and corrections made by the initials, instead of 'the real possibility of agreement on what prompted the vote of workers.
Following fruitless debate on the validity of Article 2112 of the Civil Code and the resulting contractual guarantees (zero according to the utterances of a member of the National Secretariat) some work required to establish an Electoral Commission with the task of monitoring the proper conduct of polling and counting. Request
legitimate reasons dall'increscioso episode occurred during the last referendum and when 'pop a card in more' than the number of voters, without which this would induce the RSU to invalidate the vote. The solid and
, trying to ignore the request immediately, responded later in a negative way by preventing workers, the exercise of a normal democratic right and accusing them of not have confidence in those who should represent them ...
The debate has shifted in the corridors of the company and also saw action della Sicurezza Aziendale, volto ad allontanare dal seggio i lavoratori che volevano presidiare le operazioni di voto.
Ad ora le rsu si esprimono ancora in maniera contraria e questo e’ grave ed inaccettabile.

Una domanda più che legittima verte sul perché di questo incondizionato diniego ad un’espressione di democrazia partecipata.


A voi la risposta.

V per iVrea

0 comments:

Post a Comment